London's world status and house price boom is now hurting the middle class
By jamFace at 2013-08-04 17:13:12
London, UK
68 replies
10531 views
On a moderate salary of £50k, I'd be able to pay for a 3-bed in a non-slum area ..... never.
On a moderate salary of £50k, I'd be able to pay for a 3-bed in a non-slum area ..... never.
Oh well - I kind of like renting. chiefly the part where I call the landlord whenever something breaks and he fixes it from his own pocket. I really love that bit.
Oh well - I kind of like renting. chiefly the part where I call the landlord whenever something breaks and he fixes it from his own pocket. I really love that bit.
Oh well - I kind of like renting. chiefly the part where I call the landlord whenever something breaks and he fixes it from his own pocket. I really love that bit.
Have you seen the houses in brixton?
On a moderate salary of £50k, I'd be able to pay for a 3-bed in a non-slum area ..... never.
Then factor in the train costs, from what I can tell a monthly period pass is £794.90 (£183~ a week) PLUS a zone 1 travelcard (or PAYG)
Obviously it's a personal evaluation and if it makes him happy then so be it, but from my perspective I think the whole tribulation would be too pricey in time and money to even be worth it.
On a moderate salary of £50k, I'd be able to pay for a 3-bed in a non-slum area ..... never.
Then factor in the train costs, from what I can tell a monthly period pass is £794.90 (£183~ a week) PLUS a zone 1 travelcard (or PAYG)
Obviously it's a personal evaluation and if it makes him happy then so be it, but from my perspective I think the whole tribulation would be too pricey in time and money to even be worth it.
I read a good opinion piece in the ES the other night, can't think of the writers name, although he anticipated the proposal of a a small levy on hotel stays (a tax that can be used on keeping streets clean, maintaining public cultural sites and attractions and optimistically free up cash for stuff like house building and other stuff
Sounds like it's too good to be real I know, but at least it's something.
The snag is the treasury doesn't view London to be any distinct to the rest of the UK so wouldn't let that money stay in the capital. Perhaps it's time that London becomes like New York?